{"id":6313,"date":"2018-12-09T05:44:27","date_gmt":"2018-12-09T05:44:27","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/hrcp-web.org\/hrcpweb\/?p=6313"},"modified":"2021-12-15T05:52:17","modified_gmt":"2021-12-15T05:52:17","slug":"where-does-pakistan-stand-after-70-years-of-udhr","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/hrcp-web.org\/hrcpweb\/where-does-pakistan-stand-after-70-years-of-udhr\/","title":{"rendered":"Where does Pakistan Stand After 70 years of UDHR?"},"content":{"rendered":"

Press release<\/p>\n

Where does Pakistan Stand After 70 years of UDHR?<\/strong><\/p>\n

Lahore, 10 December 2018<\/em>. Marking the 70th anniversary of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR), the Human Rights Commission of Pakistan (HRCP) organised a public lecture by its honorary spokesperson and veteran human rights defender, I A Rehman. Held at the Dorab Patel Auditorium in Lahore on 9 December 2018, the event was attended widely by civil society, including students, lawyers, human rights activists and media persons.<\/p>\n

The theme of this lecture was to assess Pakistan\u2019s performance during its third Universal Periodic Review (UPR) in 2017. Under the auspices of the Human Rights Council, all member states are given the opportunity to declare what actions they have taken to improve the human rights situations in their countries and to meet their human rights obligations.<\/p>\n

In a statement issued today, HRCP has said that it is \u2018gravely concerned at the exponential rise in the number of recommendations Pakistan has received from its peers with respect to human rights concerns in the country. In 2008, it received 51 recommendations, of which it accepted 43 and rejected eight. At its second UPR in 2012, Pakistan received 167 recommendations, of which it accepted 126, \u201cnoted\u201d 34 and rejected seven.<\/p>\n

\u2018It is a matter of serious concern that, from 167 recommendations in 2012, Pakistan\u2019s human rights barometer now stands at 289 recommendations received under the third UPR in 2017. Of these, it has \u201csupported\u201d 168, \u201cnoted\u201d 121 and \u201crejected\u201d four recommendations<\/em>.<\/p>\n

\u2018It is encouraging to note that many of the recommendations \u201csupported\u201d in principle under the third UPR relate, among others, to the reduction of poverty and inequality; to making enforced disappearance a criminal offence and ensuring that all allegations of enforced disappearance and extrajudicial executions are thoroughly investigated; to ensuring that all perpetrators of torture are brought to justice; to ensuring the right to a fair trial for all; and to preventing impunity for crimes against journalists and media workers.<\/p>\n

\u2018However, what concerns HRCP is that Pakistan has chosen to \u201cnote\u201d, rather than \u201csupport\u201d key human rights principles such as reporting the investigation and prosecution of security forces that commit human rights violations and abuses; amending discriminatory laws against marginalised groups, including women and girls and ethnic and religious minorities; protecting the rights of the child more effectively, particularly during counter-terrorism activities; desisting from issuing death sentences and executing juveniles; and taking effective measures to prevent the abuse of blasphemy legislation and the use of violence against religious minorities.<\/p>\n

\u2018HRCP strongly urges the state to commit to its willingness to continue cooperating with the United Nations human rights mechanism, and to apply both in principle and practice the UPR recommendations it has \u201cnoted\u201d as well as \u201csupported\u201d. By 2022, the country\u2019s human rights record must be seen to improve substantially \u2013 not merely to uphold an international image, but because these principles are part of the state\u2019s moral and responsibility to its citizens and residents under the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, to which it is a signatory.\u2019<\/p>\n

Dr Mehdi Hasan<\/strong><\/p>\n

Chairperson<\/p>\n<\/div><\/div><\/div>